Tag Archives: Hirokazu Ibata

A quiet revolution in Japan

The 2026 World Baseball Classic is witnessing a revolution in the managerial choices of Japan’s newest skipper, Hirokazu Ibata, who has quietly moved away from his country’s famous small-ball obsession.
 
Ibata’s starting lineup through Japan’s first three Pool C games at Tokyo Dome had sluggers everywhere but short and catcher.
 
In center, Ibata has started Seiya Suzuki, an outstanding defensive right fielder before developing the yips at Wrigley Field and becoming the Cubs’ designated hitter. Masataka Yoshida, another DH in MLB, has been in left, with the fleet-footed Ukyo Shuto and Taisei Makihara on the bench when speed and defense is needed.
 
Japanese culture is still influenced by the hierarchical neo-Confucian ethics of its feudal era. One is expected to respect one’s predecessors by preserving their teachings, and never ever contradict past masters.
 
In practice, that means talking incessantly about a style of baseball that is uniquely suited to Japanese players, with lots of bunting and with infields and outfields pulled in at the drop of a hat.

Managers are expected to expound on the spiritual importance of one-run offensive and defensive tactics, on the need for speed, on fundamentally solid defense and the importance of pitching to opponents’ weaknesses.
 
Those skippers whose teams have the skills to play differently, may do so, but only after paying lip service to tradition and offering up prayers and burning incense at the altar of small baseball, and then apologizing for their sins.
 
In Japanese, national team players are referred to as national “representatives” and feel pressure to say the right things. When Atsunori Inaba, a cerebral big-hitting outfielder during his career, managed the national team, he once appeared on a TV show with Japan’s first WBC manager, Sadaharu Oh.
 
When quizzed about his plans, Inaba began spouting Japan’s small-ball dogma until Oh said bluntly that conforming to Japanese style ball just to prove a point would be an inefficient use of the power hitters then at the skipper’s disposal.
 
Ibata is by nature soft spoken. A golden-glove shortstop whose offensive prowess was masked by playing in Japan’s toughest pitchers’ park, he perhaps didn’t feel the need to  publicly kowtow to small ball.
 
“I have carefully observed international games, especially those in the knockout rounds of the last two WBC tournaments, and noticed how often home runs made the difference, because stringing hits together one after another was difficult,” Ibata said after Tuesday’s Pool C finale.
 
Ibata’s plan, he said, is for his hitters and pitchers to go with their strengths, rather than probe for opponents’ weaknesses, and “applyjng pressure” by continually bunting runners into scoring position.
 
“I want batters to make pitchers throw strikes put good swings on the ball. In the Premier 12, I observed how teams were burned by pitching too carefully, walking batters and falling behind in counts only to give up extra-base hits.”
 
“I want our pitchers to have the confidence to challenge even the best opposing hitters, and not be afraid. If you do that, and give up a walk, I can live with that. But we should work aggressively.”
 
If Japan’s defensive limitations prove costly in Miami, there is a good chance Ibata will be roasted by the small-ball curmudgeon corps in the media for disregarding their teachings.

If, on the other hand, Japan wins, I expect the old fart brigade to praise the team’s accomplishments despite being handicapped by the skipper’s employing a style “unsuited” to Japanese players.

Subscribe to jballallen.com weekly newsletter

Hall of Infamy

I have a message for some of my fellow voters in the Japanese Baseball Hall of Fame’s players’ division, and I’d like you not to take it the wrong way: Get your heads out of your asses.

I wish I knew what was up with some Hall of Fame voters because if it was simply a matter of looking at 30 former players and choosing the seven you think are most qualified, we wouldn’t get the dog’s breakfast we saw from the 2021 players ballot.

To be fair, it was a packed ballot, with a lot of solid candidates, but for the first time since 1987, none of the new Hall of Famers were former pro players. The Hall said it was the first time since 1998 that no former players were elected, but the Hall doesn’t count former players elected by the special committee, which inducted 209-game winner Hiroshi Nakao that year.

2021 Hall of Fame ballot posts

With a slew of solid candidates on this year’s ballots it’s easy to see how big candidates can split the ballot. Shingo Takatsu led the players’ division vote with 72.3 percent, coming just 10 votes shy of induction. I didn’t vote for him this time, but he’s an OK choice.

But if quality of the player matters, then perhaps voters should ask themselves these questions, lifted from Bill James’ old abstracts:

  • Was this player ever considered the best at his position in his league for any length of time?
  • Would you expect a team to be a pennant winner if he was its best player?

Shingo Takatsu? He was one of the better relievers for an extended period, but if he was your best player you wouldn’t win a pennant.

No. 2 on this year’s players’ ballot was lefty Masahiro Yamamoto, who I did vote for. He was considered one of the CL’s better starters for a long, long time. He won a Sawamura Award. So obviously, his best was pretty darn good. The same could be said for No. 3, Alex Ramirez. He won two MVPs and four Best Nines.

After that we get into a shit show. I don’t mean to disrespect the substantial quality of all the guys on the ballot. Fifty-eight percent of the voters named Masahiro Kawai on their ballots. He was a terrific player, but if he’s the best you’ve got, you’re not going to win a pennant.

Two hundred and eight voters named him on their ballot. These are people who have been covering pro baseball for established outlets for over 15 years.

I love Kawai. He was a really good player who I thought was underrated during his career, but if you voted for him, I would appreciate it if you take your vote more seriously. If in your carefully considered opinion, you really think Kawai belongs in the hall, then your considered opinion needs a hell of a lot of explaining.

Norihiro Nakamura, a player who deserves serious consideration, got none. He received four votes, and will not be eligible to be reconsidered for another 14 or so years when he can get onto the experts’ division.

Hirokazu Ibata, a much better player than Kawai, got 1.8 percent of the vote. Kenshin Kawakami, perhaps a good candidate, got 1.4 and he’s gone, too.

It’s like there was a rebellion and voters decided that after voting in Kazuyoshi Tatsunami a year ago, and putting strong support behind Yamamoto this year, that no other former Dragons deserved support, since Kazuhiro Wada barely survived the first cut.

There are so many players on this ballot who are comparable to guys already in the Hall, but many of them may not get there because votes are being wasted by people who have no respect for their vote.

If that’s you, I’ll be happy to publish your reasoning. The more we discuss our choices and rationale, the better they should get.